Estimate Time6 min

Is downsizing worth it?

Key takeaways

  • Where you live has a big impact on your lifestyle and finances.
  • Your home helps determine lots of expenses, including utilities, insurance, taxes, and maintenance.
  • The financial planning process can help to clarify your housing goals, and look at the long-term financial impact of different options.

Few decisions have as big an impact on your lifestyle as the home you choose to live in. The space literally shapes many moments in your life, and can help determine who you know, the activities you engage in, and more. Your home is also a big deal for your financial life—few choices have as big an impact on your expenses and wealth as your home.

Housing expenses go beyond mortgage or rent: Utilities, insurance, and taxes are all part of housing expenses, and all vary based on where you choose to live. In many cases, a home also represents a large amount of wealth that could be used to fund retirement—on average, home equity makes up about 70% of net worth, according to the US Census Bureau.

With so much on the line, it's important to think carefully about the financial implications of where you will live in retirement. To illustrate how the decision to relocate can play into retirement planning, let’s look at a hypothetical couple, Frank and Julie. The couple has worked with a financial professional at various times over the years, and after their kids recently moved out, the couple wanted to understand what moving might mean for their retirement finances.

They met with their Fidelity professional, Danielle, to discuss their options. Danielle laid out the plan—they would start by discussing their goals, then get a sense of the current situation, then look at what changes might mean for their savings.

Fidelity Viewpoints

Sign up for Fidelity Viewpoints weekly email for our latest insights.


1. The goals

First and foremost, Frank and Julie want to be close to their current jobs for the next few years until they retire. Even after retirement they want to be close to their children and grandchildren, and to stay involved in some local art and community organizations. They love their current home, but it is probably unnecessarily big and located in an expensive neighborhood with good schools that they no longer use. Danielle asked about the possibility of renting, which can sometimes be a better option financially, but emotionally, it was important to Frank and Julie to own. So both agreed that they'd like to stay put for now, but would consider buying something less expensive when they retired at age 65.

2. The checkup

Before making any decisions, Danielle wants to get a good sense of the couple's current housing expenses and how those expenses factor into their retirement income plan. Frank and Julie bought their home about 10 years ago as a place to raise their kids. They own the home, but continue to carry a mortgage. They expect that when they retire they will have about $500,000 in home equity, and will have to pay about $11,500 each year for their mortgage, which is set to continue for 10 years into retirement. They also pay about $1,000 a month in taxes, and about $400 a month in insurance, utilities, and maintenance costs.

Beyond the equity in their home, the couple has saved about $1,000,000 in their retirement and savings accounts. They expect to retire in 10 years at age 65, want their retirement plan to last through age 96, and plan to maintain their current investment strategy.

3. The options

The couple has identified a condo development in a neighboring town that they think might be close enough to their friends and family. They estimate that they could buy a condo outright using the equity from the sale of their home. In fact, even after accounting for the transaction costs of the move and the purchase price, they think they could walk away with about $90,000 to add to their savings.

The condo would come with about $2,400 in annual association fees. But, the move would eliminate their mortgage, saving around $11,500 each year. It would also hypothetically reduce their housing-related expenses by about $7,000 a year, thanks to decreased taxes, maintenance, and utilities. In total, they would save about $16,500 each year.

Danielle helps them model what the future might hold if they stay put, or if they move. To illustrate the impact of the decision, Danielle uses an investment analysis tool to run 1,000 hypothetical market scenarios.2 These market simulations are illustrations based on the historic performance of stocks, bonds, and other investments.

The illustrations show that if Frank and Julie stay on their current track, their savings have a "moderate" probability of lasting until the couple reaches age 96—meaning that in 75% to 89% of the simulations, their savings appeared to let them maintain their lifestyle in retirement. (See the footnote * for important details about the assumptions and calculations made in this article.) In an average market, the couple might reach age 96 with about $3.9 million left in their portfolio, in today's dollars. In a very difficult market, defined in this case as the worst 2.5% of hypothetical market scenarios, they would likely fall short by about $970,000.

For illustration only. IMPORTANT: The projections and other information generated by eMoney Advisor regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. Results may vary with each use and over time. eMoney Advisor is a diagnostic, Web-based tool owned and maintained by eMoney Advisor, LLC, a Fidelity Investments company. See footnotes for important details about how these values were calculated and how median and downside markets were defined.

Danielle runs the same analysis adding the money that's left from the sale of the home to the couple's retirement savings and using the lower ongoing housing costs.

IMPORTANT: The projections and other information generated by eMoney Advisor regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. Results may vary with each use and over time. See footnotes for important details about how these values were calculated.

The probability that the savings would last through the couple's planned retirement increases to between 90% and 100%—which Frank and Julie think feels like a strong plan. Overall, the illustrations show that the new plan might increase their lifetime assets by more than half a million dollars in average market scenarios.

  Probability of success Balance at age 96 in median market scenario Balance at 96 in down market scenario
Stay in current home Moderate (75%–89%) $3.9 million −$970,000
Downsize Strong (90%–100%) $4.6 million −$600,000
IMPORTANT: The projections and other information generated by eMoney Advisor regarding the likelihood of various investment outcomes are hypothetical in nature, do not reflect actual investment results, and are not guarantees of future results. Results may vary with each use and over time. See footnotes for important details about how these values were calculated.

Decision time

While Frank and Julie felt pretty good about their retirement to start with, looking at the numbers helped them put the future impact of their housing decisions in perspective. Taking the long view let them see just how big an impact even moderate annual savings could have. The improved likelihood of meeting their financial goals was appealing, and so the couple decided they would downsize as their retirement approached.

The bottom line

Housing is a big chunk of most people's budgets. But it can be hard to see the big-picture impact of lots of monthly bills. Taking a step back to see how those costs might impact a financial plan over decades may help you make more informed choices. Working with a financial professional to consider the numbers, can help you find the answer that's right for you.

Start a conversation

We'll meet you where you are on your financial journey and help you get to where you want to be.

More to explore

* About the numbers in this story: The scenario analysis depicted in this story uses Monte Carlo analysis, which is based on a mathematical modeling process that attempts to take into account the changing and uncertain nature of the markets to evaluate the likelihood of certain outcomes under various market conditions and presents a probability of success, i.e., an estimate of the probability that a minimum amount of assets is achieved at the end of the simulated period (investment horizon). Monte Carlo analysis use estimates of asset class expected rates of return, and expected volatility and correlation, to model an asset allocation (each a simulation). In each simulation, a rate of return is generated for each asset class using the mean and standard deviation of the market index in the randomly chosen year. Up to 1000 trial runs are calculated resulting in a range of values that is further analyzed to produce a statistical probability (i.e., the probability of success) of an investment strategy The percentile indicates the rank of the scenarios among the 1,000 simulations. So, 50% of scenarios outperformed the median and 50% underperformed. The downside shows the scenario in the worst 2.5% of scenarios, 97.5% performed better. The probability of success is based on the percentage of market scenarios in which the plan funded the income needs to the planning age. These scenarios assume $100,000 of expenses starting today and adjusted for inflation annually. The starting balance is $1,000,000. In the downsize scenario, the expenses in retirement are reduced to reflect the lack of mortgage and lower housing-related expenses, and asset balances are increased upon sale of the residence. The projections and other information presented was generated using eMoney Advisor. eMoney Advisor is a diagnostic, Web-based tool owned and maintained by eMoney Advisor, LLC, a Fidelity Investments company. The scenarios modeled assumed that the couple qualified for the residential home sale tax exemption and that the costs of their housing-related expenses would increase at 4% annually throughout the course of the plan.

This information is intended to be educational and is not tailored to the investment needs of any specific investor.

Fidelity does not provide legal or tax advice. The information herein is general and educational in nature and should not be considered legal or tax advice. Tax laws and regulations are complex and subject to change, which can materially impact investment results. Fidelity cannot guarantee that the information herein is accurate, complete, or timely. Fidelity makes no warranties with regard to such information or results obtained by its use, and disclaims any liability arising out of your use of, or any tax position taken in reliance on, such information. Consult an attorney or tax professional regarding your specific situation.

Investment decisions should be based on an individual’s own goals, time horizon, and tolerance for risk.

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

Diversification and asset allocation do not ensure a profit or guarantee against loss.

Stock markets are volatile and can fluctuate significantly in response to company, industry, political, regulatory, market, or economic developments. Investing in stock involves risks, including the loss of principal.

Foreign markets can be more volatile than U.S. markets due to increased risks of adverse issuer, political, market, or economic developments, all of which are magnified in emerging markets. These risks are particularly significant for investments that focus on a single country or region.

Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE, SIPC, 900 Salem Street, Smithfield, RI 02917

908248.3.0